4 Honest Questions I Have For Adhyayan Suman On His ‘Shocking’ Revelations
Updated : May 20, 2016 12:48 PM IST
The ongoing tussle between Hrithik & Kangana has become a messy party with an open bar! In all corners of the floor you can find long lost drunk people trying to settle their scores. In all likeliness, the most dramatic revelation of the episode came from Adhyayan Suman who apparently was a longtime boyfriend of Kangana Ranaut. In case you’re jogging your memory around Adhyayan, he is the same guy who sung Soniyo with Kangana in Raaz 2 and in rest of his career went noticed as ‘Oh that guy with Kangana from Raaz 2’!
In all honesty Dear Adhyayan, while I respect your earnestness in bringing out your views over Kangana and exposing the undisclosed details, I can’t help but understand the rationality of it here. From you taking an ‘expensive’ bottle of champagne for Hrithik to swigging around the drink of humiliation for Kangana, how can your comments not make anybody skeptical of your purpose?
Source:bollywoodbubble
Here are 4 honest questions I have for you.
1 – What Were You Waiting For All This While?
You said it has been 7 years since you two ended your relationship and it took much of your time later to come out of the trauma. But why today? “I am not taking sides or saying that he’s right and she’s wrong, but I feel someone should speak up for Hrithik.” So if this tussle today wouldn’t have surfaced between the two stars, you would have not spoken up at all? Would you have stayed silent the way you claim to have stayed for so many years? While you try and put so many disclaimers, one can still not gulp down the fact that you kept silent on the constant ‘torture’ and ‘physical abuse’. After having spat on Kangana’s complete existing image, you say you loved her too much to reveal anything before. Apologies in place, I really don’t find substance in this theory. If your side of the story was indeed true, you wouldn’t have waited this long to speak up. Now that you have, even the thoery of love you keep talking about sounds shallow.
2 – Why bring up irrelevant details about Kangana?
From so much as listing all the Hindi abusive words in the dictionary to visiting her at 12 PM for a puja, trust us i tried making sense of it in the right context, I couldn’t. “'Mother Fu***, behen****! Bh*sd*ke! You are f***** jealous of my success!' That’s the kind of details you share while speaking on a very serious matter. “One day, Kangana called me at home in the night to do some puja. I reached at 11.30 pm as the puja was to start at 12. She had a small guest room in her apartment and she had covered it in black, including black curtains. There were some random statues of God, fire all around, some scary things kept. She asked me to chant some mantras, and locked me in. I was terrified.” I get it, she may have been mean to you, she may ultimately have left you in nowhere, but aren’t these specifying details clear enough signs of you giving it back to her? What on earth can possibly explain the connection of her abuses or her pujas to her legal tussle?
Your descriptive theories are a bag full of contradictions. You start by saying “Being a metropolitan kid studying in London and New York, I was always away from things like astrology and black magic.” And then follow it up with, “My mother was very worried and she called the family’s Panditji to come home and meet me. The first thing he asked me was: 'Khana banati hai tumhare liye?' When I said yes, he said, 'Apna impure blood milati hai khaane mein black magic ke liye.'" So is this what the metropolitan kid study in New York and London?
3 – Why involve your father and yet another set of unnecessary details?
You at one point of your explanation say that Kangana wanted to extract political favors from you and your father since I know Shekhar Suman is also a strong man politically. How does it matter here? What grounds are you referring while citing these theories? When Shekhar has himself not gone on record saying anything about Kangana ever, why do you feel the need to involve your father? "Yes. On January 13, 2009, at my birthday party at home, after most people left, Mohit Suri, Kangana, Kunal Deshmukh, my parents and dad’s few close friends were talking about how actors sometimes tend to sell our souls for commercial films. Kangana started to get offended and said, ‘We don’t sell our souls’. Dad said he was giving a generic example but she took it personally and she called my father a b****** in front of everyone. My father was furious. She left screaming started screaming abuses at him in Hindi. One thing I can’t still forgive myself for — I was a bad son to my parents during that time. This one moment changed my life forever— the way she spoke to my father. But at the time, she had manipulated my mind so beautifully that rather than breaking up with her that night, I screamed at my father. I smashed things because I was losing my mind."
No one has ever heard of any political favors that Shekhar may have pulled for Kangana and not only do these comments put you and your father in bad light, it further weakens the focus of your arguments.
4 – Are you really not eying a cinematic revival?
“One day when I was at her house, time, Bhattsaab called me after seeing the rushes of Raaz 2 and told me he loved my work and he would direct me. He quit directing by then, so I was like ‘Wow, that’s amazing!”’, is this what you’re trying to remind Mr. Mahesh Bhatt? While the film that he promised with you never went in the making, persistent mention of his ovation, siding by Hrithik to embroil yourself in one of his production, “I want to work hard on my own” like clichés, how can one not wonder if this isn’t one desperate attempt of a revival for someone who’s lost in the oblivion?
“It doesn’t come from a space where I will be doing a film with him tomorrow (laughs) and I am sure neither is he going to produce my film, but this is for people who will start commenting on social media — I don’t want anything from Hrithik,” you say these things yourself and later expect us to side by your version of theories! That’s optimism.
Conclusion
Out of nowhere from the narrative a subtle mention of ‘cocaine’ to a ‘physical abuse’ that almost ‘made you cry’ (our sympathies), the story is only as appalling as it gets. The matters of drug abuse, physical abuse that you found too tiny to be serious about, cannot be dug down under the bulky weight of love! You choose to stay mum on such crisis like issues and then vent all of it out grabbing an opportunity? That’s downright opportunism!
The questions here are only an observant form of reaction that perhaps asks for more answers and logic and not just plain one sided bashing. As much as I share your concern, your logic isn’t too sound here. I have my own set of questions I can put for Kangana (which I will) but let’s keep this one for you, just you!